Talk:United Constitutional Patriots

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

"Assist" seems to me to be non-neutral language. Prioritizes intention over effect — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

It is significant that this group is autonomous and extra-governmental. Unlike the National Guard, it is not regulated. Describing it as “unregulated” is necessary to avoid confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.125.209 (talk) 14:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New article

I'd like to split off Larry Mitchell Hopkins. Any objections? ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 16:38, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One article for now. We are not working on an article about a large group of individuals, no matter how much coverage Hopkins is gaining. WP:BLP1E would appear to apply to him. Philip Cross (talk) 17:21, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm opening up a discussion, Philip, you don't get to decide unilaterally. Not sure I agree re the BLP1E but I will take your opposition to this into account. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 18:28, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose in the usual manner, if it seems I was trying to close down further discussion. A separate article would be liable to duplicate content about the UCP. Philip Cross (talk) 18:45, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]