Talk:United Citizens Party

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

The United Citizens Party weblink appears to be down.

For reference:

http://www.unitedcitizensparty.org/

DJ Silverfish 02:37, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"The party ran candidates in 1970 and 1972; as a result the first three black candidates were elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives since Reconstruction in 1970."

I changed 1970 to 1870. I think it was just a typo.

Fusion fugue

The article goes off on a fugue about “fusion”. Almost all of this discussion is at best parenthetical; and would be better in some other article and not this one. —SlamDiego_←T 10:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the Mark Whittington for Congress link to one of a later date

I changed the Mark Whittington for Congress link to one of a later date because the Library of Congress webbot for some reason did not record too many of the internally linked pages on earlier dates. Unfortunately, the essays linked to combo selection box seem to never have been recorded, however, most of the other links do now work.

Thanks, Mark Whittington

Mwhitti482 (talk) 16:51, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple citations from the same articles

There are too many citations that heavily rely on one or two articles. At first, one of the articles was cited more than 20 times. I found additional citations to reduce the heavy reliance on one article but some of those citations have been put back. Editors should find other news coverage or scholarly articles to replace additional repetitive citations, so that information can be verified beyond one or two sources. ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 19:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Patriot Party language

I have concerns about the prominent placement of 'Patriot Part of South Carolina' in the info box. This is bound to cause confusion, as the current understanding of 'patriot' in the political world is 'MAGA' - a very different ideology from the past and current UCP. That section needs additional verification, and perhaps would be more useful as a separate article. ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 19:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it was the former official name of the party, it belongs in the infobox. Also you can't just whitewash articles that disagree with you politically. Scu ba (talk) 22:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cornel west ballot access map is wrong

i lack the knowhow on how to fix it 108.11.28.4 (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]