Talk:Unit Control Block

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Q-type address constants?

The phrase "16-bit Q-type (i.e. relocatable) addresses" is doubly wrong; first, the I/O device lookup table did not have Q-type address constants and, second, Q is used for offsets within an external dummy. Perhaps the editor meant Y-type, which is a 15-bit relocatable constant.

OS Assembler Language (PDF) (Tenth ed.), IBM, January 1974, p. 48, GC28-6514-9, Q-Type Address Constant (Assembler F only): This constant is used to reserve storage for the offset of an external dummy section. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 17:45, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Priority queueing

Priority queuing of I/O did not come in with the Workload Manager (WLM); in fact, priority queuing of I/O existed in OS/360 Release 15/16^[1] and ordered queuing^[a] existed by Release 21.^[2] Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

^ ordered by cylinder.

References

^ "Priority Enqueuing of I/O Requests" (PDF). IBM System/360 Operating System Release 15/16 (PDF) (First ed.). IBM. February 1968. p. 35. Y28-6681-0.
^ "IODEVICE" (PDF). OS System Generation Release 21 (PDF) (Eleventh ed.). IBM. February 1972. p. 338. GC28-6554-11. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)

Queuing by channel only applies to S/370 and ECPS:VSE modes

Operating systems running in z/Architecture mode do not queue I/O by channel, nor do systems running in XA or ESA mode, only systems that run in S/370 or ECPS:VSE mode and use the SIO instruction. All newer systems use the SSCH instruction and the channel subsystem handles the assignment and queuing of channels. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 20:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Cite web}} is for online citations for which there's no other appropriate template.

To quote the documentation for {{cite web}}:

This Citation Style 1 template is used to create citations for web sources that are not characterized by another CS1 template.

{{Cite book}} characterizes books, so books are not "web sources that are not characterized by another CS1 template", and there is no reason to use {{cite web}} for them. Guy Harris (talk) 22:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

user:Voidxor also removed |section=, |section-url= and |via=bitsavers.org; you restored |section= and |section-url= to one citation but not to the other. Is there a reason for that, and for not reinstating |via=bitsavers.org? --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason for that Not noticing that they'd been removed from the other citation.

and for not reinstating |via=bitsavers.org? Not seeing a reason why it's significant that the manuals from IBM happens to have been scanned into PDFs and hosted at the Computer History Museum's Bitsavers collection. Guy Harris (talk) 19:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC):[reply]

@Guy Harris: I appreciate you for at least using ~~{{cite web}}~~ {{cite book}} over the long-since-merged {{cite manual}}. Also, thank you for providing your reasoning rather than stubbornly reverting without collaborating or teaching. Your quote from the cite-web doc is something that's probably been staring me in the face, yet I've somehow missed after my 2015 conversation with FleetCommand (since banned, I see) here. Some things leave me scratching my head on Wikipedia, but I always appreciate consistency. — voidxor 20:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably you meant "for at least using {{cite book}}". I usually try to give explanations in edit comments, possibly with talk page comments, for non-obvious changes. Guy Harris (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That I did, thanks! — voidxor 22:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Voidxor: Had the change been limited to replacing {{cite manual}} with {{cite book}} and removing |via=, it would not have been objectionable. However, changing it to {{cite web}} and removing location parameters was another matter. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 14:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and as I have already admitted (above), that was due to a misunderstanding on my part after having an admin tell me that {{cite web}} should take priority for online book and news sources. Why rehash this? Your continued use of {{cite manual}} instead of {{cite book}} is another matter; please don't conflate. You could've just as easily used {{cite book}} and pointed me to the correct guideline, but it took Guy Harris to do that. — voidxor 17:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources?

Is the Network and Systems Professionals Association (NASPA) NaSPA Technical Support Magazine considered to be a WP:RS? I'm thinking in particular of Keeping up With the Unit Control Block: Part II by Sam Golob. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 14:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[2] rdered by cylinder.

[1] "Priority Enqueuing of I/O Requests" (PDF). IBM System/360 Operating System Release 15/16 (PDF) (First ed.). IBM. February 1968. p. 35. Y28-6681-0.

[3] "IODEVICE" (PDF). OS System Generation Release 21 (PDF) (Eleventh ed.). IBM. February 1972. p. 338. GC28-6554-11. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)

[1]

[a]

[2]