Talk:Union Stock Yards/GA1
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
- The lead does not satisfy WP:LEAD:
- It is too short (I recommend two paragraphs);
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- It contains information that is not mentioned in the main text (for instance the city become known as "hog butcher for the world).
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- It is too short (I recommend two paragraphs);
- The 'In popular culture' section should be disbanded, while the information should be relocated to other sections.
- Is it O.K. just to reformat it as prose.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- I put one {{cn}} tag into the article. Please, provide a citation.
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Can, at least, some items in 'Bibliography' be cited in the text? It will improve the article from the point of view of verifiability.-Ruslik_Zero 09:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- I have cited the place where you placed the citation tag.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
The article is delisted. Ruslik_Zero 14:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Since you fixed everything, I will reconsider my decision. The article is kept. Ruslik_Zero 13:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)