Talk:Union Station, Denver

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Merge with LoDo

I greatly appreciate the effort to make good articles for every neighborhood in Denver, but I think we may be bordering on superfluousness by having separate articles for LoDo and for Union Station. Virtually nobody knows the neighborhood of Union Station by that name but rather LoDo or possibly Commons Park for the area west of the train tracks. I think the LoDo article makes a pretty good distinction between what is statistical and imaginary in the view of Denverites between those two areas and think that article could cover virtually everything that this one does. Am I the only one who thinks that? Vertigo700 (talk) 04:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Don't Merge

Please don't merge those two articles; each is important and the distinction is needed, I believe. One of the reasons it (the new Union Station Neighborhood article) was created was to provide genuine neighborhood links for the new page National Register of Historic Places listings in Downtown Denver, Colorado, that links to statistical neighborhoods. There was no link for the Union Station neighborhood. The National Register page for Denver used to be a single page but was divided up based largely on Denver's statistical neighborhoods. The distinction between neighborhoods and historic districts is an important one and ought not to be diluted. Rino (formerly Commons Park) ought to be mentioned also--good point. Denverjeffrey (talk) 11:52, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Union Station, Denver (neighborhood). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.denvergov.org/Infrastructure/DenverUnionStation/tabid/425708/Default.aspx
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.denvergov.org/Infrastructure/DenverUnionStation/tabid/425708/Default.aspx
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090814004332/http://www.denverunionstation.org:80/ to http://www.denverunionstation.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]