Talk:Union Automobile Company/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs) 17:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, figured that since I already reviewed another Lambert article for GA (the June Backlog drive), I'd go ahead and review this one, too.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The prose is stilted and lacks variety, but it's adequate for GA. I suggest, though, that you ask someone to copyedit it for you.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
I checked the refs I could access and they seem fine. They're formatted correctly and support your claims.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I AGF that this article is broad enough. It's unfortunate that there doesn't seem to be many sources out there about the Lamberts; they're such an interesting family. Someone should write a book about why they failed and Ford did not! ;)
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No evidence of edit warring.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Two images, one in infobox; both tagged correctly. It's fine for how short this article is, but I wonder if you could add more by putting them in a gallery. Just a suggestion; not something you have to do.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I'm passing this article to GA, even though the prose isn't great and can be improved. Keep up the good work writing about the Lamberts and the early history of automobiles. Best, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 04:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]