Talk:Unicorn Frappuccino
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Unicorn Frappuccino article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Dragon Frappuccino was copied or moved into Unicorn Frappuccino with this edit on 17 April 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Sources
[edit]- http://www.businessinsider.com/starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino-review-2017-4
- https://www.bustle.com/p/what-does-the-unicorn-frappuccino-at-starbucks-taste-like-this-flavor-changing-drink-wont-last-long-52227
- http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/19/news/companies/starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino/
- http://www.cbsnews.com/news/starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino-needs-to-deliver-more-than-buzz/
- http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/35178132/starbucks-calls-shifting-color-drink-a-unicorn-frappuccino
- http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2017/04/19/starbucks-unveils-whimsical-unicorn-drink-internet-freaks-out.html
- http://www.cosmopolitan.com/food-cocktails/a9523197/unicorn-frappuccino-review/
- http://fortune.com/2017/04/18/starbucks-unicorn-colored-frappuccino-secret-menu/
- https://www.cnet.com/news/starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino-taste-test-review/
- http://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/18/yes-starbucks-is-launching-a-magical-unicorn-frappuccino.html
- http://www.masslive.com/food/2017/04/the_starbucks_unicorn_frappucc.html
- http://www.silive.com/news/2017/04/starbucks_unicorn_frappuccino.html
- http://www.today.com/food/starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino-t110477
- http://www.seattletimes.com/business/starbucks/starbucks-trots-out-unicorn-drink/
- http://www.post-gazette.com/life/drinks/2017/04/18/Starbucks-calls-shifting-color-drink-a-Unicorn-Frappuccino/stories/201704180165
- http://www.nj.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2017/04/starbucks_unicorn_frappuccino_changes_colors_flavo.html
- http://www.abc15.com/entertainment/events/starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino-a-color-changing-frappuccino-that-has-all-of-us-intrigued
- http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/04/18/starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino-will-anyone-over-13-drink-this/
- http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2017/04/18/starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino/
- http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino-20170418-story.html
---Another Believer (Talk) 18:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Ingredients
[edit]It's made with more than that. I'd like to see it included. Thanks. Savvyjack23 (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Done. Icarus of old (talk) 12:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Updated appropriate size referenced in article from 20 ounces to 24 ounces [1] Baristapaints (talk) 05:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC) baristapaints
References
No reason to delete/merge article...
[edit]...just because one IP consistently seems to find it irrelevant. Icarus of old (talk) 15:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- It's not just one IP. I've been biding my time because I know that this subject isn't notable, but I want to give it enough time so I can show it's not notable and should either be deleted or redirected. Primefac (talk) 15:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Best of luck "biding" that time! Icarus of old (talk) 15:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- The nice thing about waiting is that it involves no effort! Primefac (talk) 15:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Best of luck "biding" that time! Icarus of old (talk) 15:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose merge. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Um... what merge? There is no proposal. Primefac (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Primefac: The title is this section is "no reason to delete/merge article", to which I am agreeing. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Um... what merge? There is no proposal. Primefac (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
@Shalor (Wiki Ed): I am curious, why are you editing this article as part of your work with the Wiki Education Foundation? ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- I received an alert that it was up for proposed deletion because a student had edited it at one point in time. Upon looking at the article I can see why it was tagged - the coverage for this was pretty slim and while it deserves a mention in the parent article for frappuccinos, that's about it. It caused a bit of a media frenzy while it was out, but the majority of the coverage was of the "slow news day" variety and tended to revolve around the same thing - that the drink released, sold out quickly, and was seen as a quirky thing to take photographs of - and all of the coverage is from the same 1-3 week time span, so there's no true depth of coverage. I'm not going to revert anyone if they decide to restore it, but I don't really think it's ultimately all that notable in the grand scheme of things. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Shalor (Wiki Ed): Thanks for explaining. Shouldn't there be a tag on this talk page to show work by a student editor, or enrollment in a class project, or something? I don't know the details of your role at Wiki Ed, but just a suggestion: you might consider working via talk page discussions instead of single-handedly deciding to redirect pages, etc. Also, I must disagree, as I find this subject notable. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- I was just following WP:BEBOLD since I didn't think that the page history should be deleted. If you want you can restore it (which you have), that would also fall within BEBOLD. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- 'Twas just a suggestion. Again, I don't know the specifics of your role, but I'd recommend starting talk page discussions and getting consensus for major decisions. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:05, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- I was just following WP:BEBOLD since I didn't think that the page history should be deleted. If you want you can restore it (which you have), that would also fall within BEBOLD. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Shalor (Wiki Ed): Thanks for explaining. Shouldn't there be a tag on this talk page to show work by a student editor, or enrollment in a class project, or something? I don't know the details of your role at Wiki Ed, but just a suggestion: you might consider working via talk page discussions instead of single-handedly deciding to redirect pages, etc. Also, I must disagree, as I find this subject notable. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Coffee drink?
[edit]Despite its latter name, according to Starbucks' website, there isn't a drop of coffee in its ingredients and should not have the pertaining category attached to this article. You can find that source here [1]. Savvyjack23 (talk) 18:24, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- This "frappuccino syrup" isn't made with any coffee. Savvyjack23 (talk) 18:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)