Talk:Unibind

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Prod or AfD?

I think the notability concerns are valid, but there are enough hits on Google Books that I would like this to get the extra scrutiny of an AfD Guy Macon (talk) 09:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no. I'm not picking up that end of the chainsaw again, I'm running out of fingers. Looks like there's at least one Google Books hit that mentions Unibind in passing, which makes it at least as notable as some random plastic diode. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made a start. Marasmusine (talk) 18:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Were you going to add a citation or two? That's what the article really needs to avoid future notability concerns. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More of a replacement. I removed mybinding.com citation because it was a commercial website that would not have passed WP:RS. I added Richard Craft's "Perfect Binding" instead. It's only one paragraph. I have no interest in binding machines and can't remember why this is on my watchlist. Other possible sources: Unibind PhotoBook system is recommended in "Digital Photography" (John Wiley and Sons, 2010) and "The Art of Fine Art Printing" (Uwe Steinmueller, 2006) but I wouldn't call the coverage "significant". There are other hits on Google Books that are limited to snippet views, but hint at something more substantial (People's Computer Company, PC Magazine). It feels like this would pass Notability given enough investigation. This is pretty low on my to-do list :) Marasmusine (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled on Unibind while looking at Category:Dead-end pages. This is a fruitful source of articles that need the roughest sort of copyediting to get them to the point where people can actually start working on them. Since the threshold of notability is miserably low, I won't try an AfD nomination in hopes that Wikproject:Bookbinding will clean this up and turn it into a Featured Article some day. --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just for you, then, I'll put in extra effort to expand this article! Marasmusine (talk) 21:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]