Talk:Unholy alliance (geopolitical)
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Teddy Roosevelt and Unholy Alliance
[edit]Editor Mbhiii keeps inserting under various IPs text that TR used the term Unholy Alliance as one of the original uses of the term. None of the cites back this up - while his use of other words is a similar meaning, its not an 'original use' as the edits are claiming. 68.25.103.189 (talk) 20:20, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- The # of errors you continue to commit are astounding, but then perhaps that is your purpose. -12.7.202.2 (talk) 21:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Please assume good-faith when editing. The text did not agree with the citations. I've corrected the text and added a citation that does back it up. 68.25.103.189 (talk) 22:16, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Edit warring will lead nowhere. Try to get consensus at Wikipedia:Requests for comment. Ezeu (talk) 23:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Keep?
[edit]"Unholy alliance" is just a phrase which, after being coined, has been used in varied contexts. Do we need this article?--Jack Upland (talk) 09:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)