Talk:Unholy (Sam Smith and Kim Petras song)
Appearance
Unholy (Sam Smith and Kim Petras song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 1, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It should be mentioned that the main melodic "hook" of this song has a Middle Eastern sound, which was contributed by Omer Fedi. 76.190.213.189 (talk) 01:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Unholy (Sam Smith and Kim Petras song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 15:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- 20%
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Leaving my suggestions for improvement below:
- Pass/fail:
- Background: "Latch" is linked twice - to keep up with the consistency in this article, it should just be wikilinked the first time
- Literally everything else in this article is good, get this one minor edit fixed and you have yourself a GA. Cherrell410 (talk) 15:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.