Talk:Unfair prejudice in United Kingdom company law

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Start of the page

I wanted to note, I've named this page longwindedly, "Unfair prejudice in United Kingdom company law", though I've set up for unfair prejudice to redirect here. I expect other jurisdictions use the same terminology, but also that the UK was first (correct me if I'm wrong!), and so the redirect should remain going here when it eventuates that other "unfair prejudice" pages pop up. Anyone who can help with the content, please do. And note, this is part of work going on with the UK company law page. Wik idea 11:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The term 'unfair prejudice' is a term of art in United States evidence rules. I am editing relevance law to point to 'unfair prejudice.' I think that separating "Unfair prejudice in UK company law" from "unfair prejudice" is probably feasible at this point. I plan on editing evidence as I study for evidence in law school. --Colobikeguy (talk) 21:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of additional remedies?

Would the inclusion of the remedy of "winding up" provided under Section 122(1)(g) of the Insolvency Act 1986 and qualification of s.125(2) be a useful addition to the page? Reference can be made to Re Ebrahami v Westbourne Galleries (1973), noting that such a granting of a winding up order may no longer be available due to s994 CA2006, but this is currently untested in the courts. JTW4 (talk) 09:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]