Talk:Underhill Society of America

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Long Island, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Genealogy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

‎

Help

Requesting help from all WikiProject members on this and related articles including Estelle Skidmore Doremus, Francis Jay Underhill, William Wilson Underhill, and David Harris Underhill.

COI

In response to the Conflict of Interest tag, I am not a member of the Underhill Society of America. I have striven to maintain a neutral point of view, and include relevant secondary documents to support all assertions that are made. I have received no compensation or benefit for developing this page, and take offense at anyone suggesting otherwise. Placepromo (talk) 01:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the tag as no evidence has been given to justify it, and while you have lots of edits in related articles, you have lots of other edits as well, clearly demonstrating you aren't a SPA. I have also withdrawn my nominations in two AFDs on articles you created after consulting with someone who knows more about these things than I do. Sorry for any inconvenience or misunderstanding. The AFDs still exist until an Admin closes, and they may let them run their course, but there is an admin involved who believes they are notable, which helps. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I need to point out that it is not the admin who decides. The community decides, and the admin decides what the view is of those members of the community who have expressed an opinion that is based on policy and matches the situation. I have, for example, closed many AfDs as delete though I may personally have thought otherwise. DGG ( talk ) 02:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of MILHIST tag

I have removed the MILHIST tag. Although Underhill was a soldier, the Underhill Society has no obvious military connection and there is no military content in the article. As such, it is non-notable in a military context.Monstrelet (talk) 11:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]