Talk:Under the Cherry Moon
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Under the Cherry Moon.jpg
[edit]
Image:Under the Cherry Moon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Under the Cherry Moon.jpg
[edit]Image:Under the Cherry Moon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Merging Christopher "Chris" Tracy here
[edit]The doesn't appear to be any real world notability for the character, aside from the fact that Prince wrote a song called "Christopher Tracy's Parade". Unless some notability exists for the character, I'll turn Christopher "Chris" Tracy into a redirect. 'Christopher "Chris" Tracy' isn't even the character's name, it's Christopher Tracy, or possibly Chris Tracy, so the the article is an unlikely search target. Markfury3000 (talk) 23:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- More than a month and no one has objected, so I'm redirecting the article here. Markfury3000 (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Under the Cherry Moon. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1986/1986st.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Review
[edit]The film may have been denounced for its lack of originality or the comedy scene where two stoodges break into an old woman's home(one enters while the other stands by on the lookout), a concept that would later be used in Big Momma's House, which did a little bit better come to think of it. The ending was very poor and the film in general was a slapstick drama, which is innovative in terms of genre fusion. One result I don't agree with was the Razzie for Worst Picture; the film was clearly intended to be in black and white for cultural context.