Talk:Unconstitutional constitutional amendment

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:08, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that courts and legal scholars in some countries have expressed support for the idea that even a properly ratified constitutional amendment can be unconstitutional? Source: [1]

Created by Futurist110 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk (We are the champions, my friends) 11:28, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

If I'll do a QPQ, will you change your mind? Futurist110 (talk) 02:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

I have now done my QPQ here: Template:Did you know nominations/Barbecue spaghetti. Futurist110 (talk) 02:46, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

adding tick.___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk (We are the champions, my friends) 12:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Futurist110 (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)