Talk:Uncanny Stories (magazine)

Uncanny Stories (magazine) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 13, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Uncanny Stories (magazine)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 22:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passing lead, images.

Publication history

It's a little futile to introduce the abbreviation for science fiction (sf), and then not abbreviate the two occurences of the term in the first paragraph, and abbreviate one use in the second paragraph. Best to just keep all occurences expanded. Space isn't at a premium, as it might be in print, so abbreviations only make the reader work more.
Agreed; removed. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passing "Bibliographic details", footnotes.

References

In the footnotes, you make reference to three pages of Edwards & Nicholls. You're missing that publication down here.
Fixed. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-- Zanimum (talk) 17:48, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be it, on another read through. GA! -- Zanimum (talk) 22:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]