Talk:Unbioctium
Appearance
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Extended periodic table Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Extended periodic table |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
The link does not actually contain any "properties" except those derived mathematically by the periodicity and definition of the topic. The VfD was not ambiguous...there's nothing useful here beyond speculation. The ref is called "properties", but it doesn't support or mention any of the chemical/physical properties assertions in the article. I'll be happy to AfD it or even tag for speedy deletion if you like. DMacks 03:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Screw it. I'm reverting to the #REDIRECT per the VfD. If you don't like it, feel free to file for a review of that community-based administratively-blessed decision. DMacks 03:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Recreation of Unbioctium
[edit]The talk at Talk: Wikiproject Elements says that unbioctium would be the last physically possible element. That might make it notable enough for an article. Gcchemistry (talk) 22:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)