Talk:Una Ross, 25th Baroness de Ros
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Dunc reverts and says 'Primary source that's also being misused, unbalances such a short stub and doesn't belong at present'. I see the denial tag team is operating in perfect co-ordination. So what is wrong with a primary source? And it is a published source. And why is it inappropriate 'at present'? Unbalancing is a new rule I presume. All the added detail does is start filling in the blanks in this article or 'short stub'. So how can the process start without 'unbalancing'? --Fynire (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Try adding something that's actually relevant to why she has an article. O Fenian (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (peerage) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (peerage) articles
- Peerage and Baronetage work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of peers
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class England-related articles
- Unknown-importance England-related articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in England
- WikiProject England pages