Talk:Ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Acoustics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Acoustics Taskforce.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 December 2021 and 12 January 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dm0507. Peer reviewers: Adrienne Workman.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Feedback

Check for readability: The article is generally well-written and clear, with a target audience that likely includes medical professionals. However, some sentences could maybe be simplified for improved readability but the topic in itself is pretty complex.

Adherence to topic / Not getting off track: It stays on the topic without deviating or going off on tangents. Goes into detail when appropriate.

Organization & Flow: Logical flow from background to mechanism, uses, and limitations that I expect from a wikipedia article. Could benefit from a larger mechanism section.

Use of images and figures: No images but images of this technology could be proprietary or cause copyright concerns

Proper use of citations: Citations are used frequently and appropriately

Paraphrasing: Articles appears to have adequate paraphrasing

Quality Sources: Uses review articles

Check for bias and equal-sided arguments: Uses words like may or could, appropriately avoiding bias and not making claims. Rsclydesdale (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]