Talk:UltraSPARC IV

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

While the article does need cleanup, I don't think it's appropriate to tag it for deletion; Sun CPUs are as notable as Intel or AMD models (see Category:Microprocessors). OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 04:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds like Sun PR:

"The UltraSPARC IV+ processor, and the servers powered by the processor, have been very successful for Sun Microsystems. In May of 2006, it was announced Sun had reclaimed UNIX Server Revenue Market leadership."

Therefore, I think it should be removed. If UltraSPARC IV+ is so successful, then why is Sun so unprofitable? These sentences sound like they came out of Sun's PR department. The truth is that Linux is taking over the market, and SPARC may be doomed. Westwind273 02:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]