Talk:UltraCommuter

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal UltraCommuter is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

Removed PROD because the article meets Notability for vehicles. However the article needs work, which I intend to do, and may be moved either into Waikato University or the more general article on New Zealand automobiles. NealeFamily (talk) 20:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You do understand that when assessing notability you have to consider WP:V, which means excluding all content not supported by a WP:RS? In this case there is only one source and it's not a WP:RS because it's based on an interview with the creator. This leaves us with no facts supported by WP:RS. I fail to see how it can be notable. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I need to do a more research on this vehicle and, as I stated, I may end up merging the article into another. It may, as you suggest, be inadequate to support an article on its own, but I just don't know for certain yet. I didn't want the article to be deleted until I had done that (hopefully over the next week or so).NealeFamily (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]