Talk:Ultima (series)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bridies (talk · contribs) 10:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm failing this article without a detailed review:
- The article has in the last few days rightly been tagged for multiple WP:V issues. The are whole sections with no citations: this is not necessarily a big issue for plot information but is a quick-fail issue for the anti-piracy and artificial scripts sections.
- The article is massively over-weighted towards covering the in-game stuff: such as the plot, the game play, the "virtues" and even the "artificial scripts". Not sure if this is justified or not, but the real world commentary is by contrast severely lacking. Only one paragraph one the reception/legacy/impact of the whole series; and little if any of this type of commentary in the other sections.
- Barely any lead section. Two lines.
- As a secondary issue, I'm thinking an over-abundance of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists. bridies (talk) 10:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)