Talk:Uintatherium

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Size

The article says that Uintatherium was the size of a Rhino, but rhinos vary widely in size. The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 21:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, wellll... to within an order of magnitude, all rhinos are the same linear size, like all humans. But few people even know about the Sumatran rhino. But with the smallest rhino massing nearly a tonne, and the largest less than 4 tonnes, I reckon it gives us not too bad an idea of whether any animal you trip over is likelier to be a uintatherium or a goat. Anyway, the article gives an estimate of about 2.5 tonnes, which sounds like a good average rhino, no? JonRichfield (talk) 08:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marshy browsers

I have not changed the text, yet, but I am bothered by a couple of apparently contradictory statements. Consider: "...a large browsing animal..." and "...the aquatic plants from marshes that seem to have comprised their diet...". I could of course re-word the text to emphasise the unusualness of a diet of marshes, but more importantly, since when is an animal that eats aquatic plants from marshes a browser? I think that text need re-thinking plus some citations. What do uintatherium cheek teeth look like? Hmmm... I see that online Britannica say: "The teeth were also distinctive: males of the genus possessed large, powerful canines; incisors were absent in the upper jaw but present in a reduced state in the lower; and the upper molars were characterized by V-shaped crests." That sounds more like browser than marsh-eater to me. See http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/612818/Uintatherium . But I am no palaeontologist. Mind you, I went looking and found a remarkably interesting site: http://faculty.baruch.cuny.edu/jwahlert/enamel/schmelz.html Ooooh boyyy... Distraction alert! The more I look the more I find that needs attention! I'm outta here for now! JonRichfield (talk) 08:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]