Talk:Uijeongbu scandal
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Uijeongbu scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200701/200701080014.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Rationale for deletion
[edit]Incredibly short, single-paragraph stub article about an event nobody outside of South Korea remembers. Of its 15 edits prior to my nomination, 3 are from before 2015, 4 are from Piotrus, and only 2 of its 6 edits between 2016 and my nomination are not by bots. Oh, and it only has 3 sources, not counting the "Further Reading" section. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 00:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Give Wikipedia:Notability a read. This article is notable. Being a paragraph long is not a supporting argument for deletion. You also didn't follow deletion protocol and generate a discussion page. I'm going to undo your nom, I don't think it's likely to pass.
- I welcome you to renom with the proper protocol though. toobigtokale (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)