Talk:Ugly (House)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the Plot, "Dr. Taub, inspired by his experience as a plastic surgeon", remove "inspired" since it is a peacock term, per here.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- In the Plot, "Dr. Taub, inspired by his experience as a plastic surgeon", remove "inspired" since it is a peacock term, per here.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Dates need to be unlinked, per here. In the Cultural references section, italicize "Patch Adams", per here. In the Reception section, there's no need for "TV Squad" and "BuddyTV" to be italicized, since they are websites.
- Half-check. Dates need to be unlinked. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Check.--Music26/11 22:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- You stole my line. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Check.--Music26/11 22:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Half-check. Dates need to be unlinked. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Dates need to be unlinked, per here. In the Cultural references section, italicize "Patch Adams", per here. In the Reception section, there's no need for "TV Squad" and "BuddyTV" to be italicized, since they are websites.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- I believe Image:HouseUgly.jpg needs a lower resolution.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- I believe Image:HouseUgly.jpg needs a lower resolution.
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
I think everything is taken care of, take a look.--Music26/11 19:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you to Music2611 for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)