Talk:Ubuntu (typeface)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ubuntu (typeface) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Out of date tag
[edit]An editor has tagged this as "out pf date", but hasn't indicated why this is the case. Some indication of what is missing or wrong is required to fix this. - Ahunt (talk) 11:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- My apologies for not indicating what’s out-of-date. We need to include details about the newly released Ubuntu Monospace and Condensed variants, as well as the timeline of expected releases. —Fitoschido [shouttrack] \\ 20 August, 2011 [11:28]
- Okay, thanks for explaining that. I don't suppose you have a ref that indicates the information so it can be added? - Ahunt (talk) 12:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- I found one ref added what I think is the text you are looking for and removed the tag. Please have a look and see if that covers the subject adequately. - Ahunt (talk) 12:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. I haven’t found refs other than Ubuntu’s wiki and a tip I sent to OMG! Ubuntu!, but I’ll keep searching. —Fitoschido [shouttrack] \\ 20 August, 2011 [13:07]
- I found one ref added what I think is the text you are looking for and removed the tag. Please have a look and see if that covers the subject adequately. - Ahunt (talk) 12:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for explaining that. I don't suppose you have a ref that indicates the information so it can be added? - Ahunt (talk) 12:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- That is a worthwhile ref, so I have added it. Do you think more needs to be said, or is is adequately covered now? - Ahunt (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Now the article is much better, thanks! Now I would like to add details about glyph coverage expansion planned in two phases (Dalton Maag’s initial contract and community expansion), but my initial concern is fixed now Maybe in a day or two I’ll start an article about Dalton Maag. —Fitoschido [shouttrack] \\ 20 August, 2011 [13:38]
- That is a worthwhile ref, so I have added it. Do you think more needs to be said, or is is adequately covered now? - Ahunt (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- That would be helpful as long as you have some third party refs to show notability. Have a look at WP:CORP as well to see what you need for refs and such. - Ahunt (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Unicode coverage
[edit]cf. Free_UCS_Outline_Fonts#Unicode_coverage or DejaVu_fonts#Unicode_coverage how about it? Echinacin35 (talk) 19:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
SWA
[edit]Is that the Ubuntu font that I see used in the Southwest Airlines livery?
Categories:
- Start-Class Typography articles
- Low-importance Typography articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Linux articles
- Low-importance Linux articles
- WikiProject Linux articles