Talk:Ubisoft Reflections/Archive 1

Archive 1

Requested move

Could an admin delete the redirect Ubisoft Reflections, so that we can move this page to there? The company has been renamed Ubisoft Reflections and that's the official name now, so there's now point of keeping this name.--EclipseSSD (talk) 20:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Could you please provide sources for Ubisoft Reflections, I searched "Reflections" at Ubisoft http://www.ubisoftgroup.com/index.php?p=34 and found no mention of "Ubisoft Reflections". I found one saying "Ubisoft's Reflections studio." here http://www.ubisoftgroup.com/index.php?p=59&art_id=60&vars=Y29tX2lkPTQ0Mw%3D%3D EconomistBR (talk) 20:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Here are some links, to prove my point: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/3/749/9B5, http://www.developmag.com/jobs/currently-recruiting/, http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7334&Itemid=57,and this http://www.scriptsociety.com/WhatsNew/network-programmers-ubisoft-reflections-next-generation.html--EclipseSSD (talk) 15:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I found those sources too yesterday, the problem is that Ubisoft doesn't mention Ubisoft Reflections anywhere and also there is no website for Reflections Studios anymore. I would prefer to move the page to Reflections Studio or Reflections Studio (Ubisoft), since Ubisoft refers to it once as Ubisoft’s Reflections studio.EconomistBR (talk) 16:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Ubisoft doesn't have to mention the name directly even if it's the official name. If the company has been transferred it's probably going to be called Ubisoft Reflections, and they're probably waiting until the development of the next Driver video game to announce the name change.--EclipseSSD (talk) 16:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Look, I don't want to sound as if I am picking sides, in fact I really don't care if the name changes to Pink Elephant Reflections. Having said that, I think that we need at least 1 reference from UBISOFT mentioning Ubisoft Reflections.

Ubisoft released Driver 76 in 2007 but Ubisoft doesn't mention Refletions anywhere, let alone Ubisoft Reflections.

I would favor moving this page to Reflections (Ubisoft) or Reflections Studios.

⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 00:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Check out this page: http://www.ubi.com/UK/Games/Info.aspx?pId=5278 Ubisoft refers to Reflections as "Ubisoft’s Reflections studio". ⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 00:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually, the link in question DOES mention Ubisoft Reflections, and it's their official website. They said it themselves, "developers: Ubisoft Reflections" - that's what they call their Reflections studio, they don't always have to call it by it's official name, which by the way, is exactly Ubisoft Reflections.--EclipseSSD (talk) 17:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, yes, my bad, I had missed that, I had focused on the text. It's settled, Ubisoft Reflections it will be. We now have an official Ubisoft source referring to Reflections as Ubisoft Reflections. Good work ⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 18:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I added Speedy Deletion tag under the CSD-G6 rationale to the Ubisoft Reflections page in order to faciliate the page move. ⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 19:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. No hard feelings, eh? Can't wait until the new Driver video game comes out for PS3. That should be good. --EclipseSSD (talk) 19:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Disagreements are as part of Wikipedia as water is to oceans, better get used to them. The only thing I didn't like was your attempt to move this page despite of the fact that no agreement had yet been reached here. You should have waited.

Speedy Deletion proposal was rejected, I will try contacting an administrator directly. ⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 20:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Address

Anyone know the address of their site? Care to link it in?

I don't think they have one. -albrozdude 22:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Reflections Interactive has resisted this domain www.reflectionsinteractive.com and have it parked by network solutions. Be believe they are only using this domain for mail purposes. --Driver Madness 13:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Reflections.gif

Image:Reflections.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I can't beleive I am talking to a bot!!!!! Image:Reflections.gif is a company logo, therefore I have the right to use it here.

EconomistBR (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Reflections.gif

Image:Reflections.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Amiga Shadow of the Beast.png

Image:Amiga Shadow of the Beast.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)