Talk:U Me Aur Hum/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 03:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Please improve the poster's non-free use rationale with this template.
• I could not find any issues with the lead. Infobox also looks good.
• "The newly-married couple begin" → "The newly-married couple begins"
• In #Production, add a serial comma after Sutanu Gupta and "Gundaraj (1995)".
• In #Soundtrack, 'a "innocent' should be 'an "innocent'.
• "better-received by overseas" – reword
• Remove the hyphen between "review-aggregator".
• Mark references from The Hindu with "|url-access=subcription".
• Like always, your articles are properly cited with reliable sources. Great job!

Done. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 09:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed