	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

The most important factor in interchanging an aspect design model is that the semantics within the model should be described explicitly and transferred precisely. To resolve this issue, we developed UXF/a (UXF, aspect extension), an interchange format for aspect design models, which is based on XML (eXtensible Markup Language). UXF/a is an extension to the UXF (UML eXchange Format), which is the format to describe UML models, to capture aspect information. UXF is carefully designed to be simple and well structured enough to encode, publish, access and interchange UML models. XML is a sophisticated subset of SGML (Standard Generalized Markup Language)and provides the following advantages: 1. Application neutrality (vender independence)

2. User extensibility

3. Ability to represent arbitrary and complex information

4. Validation scheme of data structure

5. Human readability

Irrelevant

It's only an academic design, the article should be deleted.

I think it is a relevant information when evaluating documentation formats regarding future-proofness. UXF being a standardized format makes the usage of UMLet more attractive compared to applications with vendor specific, proprietary formats. At least this is my conclusion after reading this article, which is why I found it helpful to me. That said, I don't see a problem merging its content into https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UMLet, potentially with a redirect from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UXF, so the information can still be found. --91.5.237.247 (talk) 06:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]