Talk:UTair Flight 579
Appearance
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Infix"
[edit]YSSYguy, perhaps you'd like to explain how that is an infix (click) before silenty reverting my changes. 213.7.253.91 (talk) 10:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
2 August 2024
[edit]@Aviationwikiflight. I just don't get it. How is adding which company built the Boeing 737, when it was built, its flight hours history, and what type of engines it had "Unnecessary" and "non-relevant" in the aircraft and crew section which should contain the aircraft details and history and crew(pilot) details. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm also talking about other articles which you reverted my work on such as: Metrojet Flight 9268, Air Inter Flight 148. Partially on Asiana Airlines Flight 214 and American Airlines Flight 102. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- (Removing the flight hours/cycles and the manufacture date on was not my intention. I've reinstated that information) Whilst an essay, WP:AVILAYOUT-ACC states that the aircraft section should have a description of the aircraft to include the make and model and registration. Other information on the aircraft should only be included if related to the accident. Not everything should be on wikipedia solely because it's true. Why would someone need to know what engines the aircraft used in an accident unrelated to engine problems? It's also redundant stating who manufactured the aircraft since the aircraft type is already stated. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh my god. Thank you for opening my eyes on this topic. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 15:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- (Removing the flight hours/cycles and the manufacture date on was not my intention. I've reinstated that information) Whilst an essay, WP:AVILAYOUT-ACC states that the aircraft section should have a description of the aircraft to include the make and model and registration. Other information on the aircraft should only be included if related to the accident. Not everything should be on wikipedia solely because it's true. Why would someone need to know what engines the aircraft used in an accident unrelated to engine problems? It's also redundant stating who manufactured the aircraft since the aircraft type is already stated. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class Aviation accident articles
- Aviation accident task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Unknown-importance Russia articles
- Unknown-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles with no associated task force
- WikiProject Russia articles