Talk:USS Rancocas

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Appearance

I've removed the reference to "Aegis cruiser", as that's ambiguous. Is the top a replica (built in 1976, apparently) of a Ticonderoga class cruiser (ca. 1980), or something else? --StuartBrady 17:40, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The top section of CSEDS does not exactly match any Aegis ship, of any country. The antenna placement is similar to a USN Aegis cruiser (CG), with a 90 degree rotation on a vertical axis. It is more of an early concept model. ^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.223.24 (talk) 03:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is correct as currently written. The "superstructure" of the building was from early drawings for the Strike Cruiser (which would have had nuclear propulsion). It was cancelled due to cost, and the planned Aegis Destroyer (based on the Spruance hull) was re-designated as a cruiser. I added some wiki-links to other articles to make it easier to dig for relevant details. RookWolf (talk) 19:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commissioned ship or not??

The article presently says ″While not a commissioned ship in the United States Navy, it is a Navy-owned building, staffed by Navy personnel attached to Aegis Technical Representative (AEGIS TECHREP).″ However Lockheed Martin's page for the facility appears to contradict this:

"Despite its landlocked location, the Rancocas is a commissioned naval vessel, manned by sailors of the U.S. Navy. " http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/100years/stories/cornfield-cruiser.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.234.251.101 (talk) 00:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ my own observation, on-site

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on USS Rancocas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141107014334/http://www.nj.gov/dep/hpo/1identify/nrsr_lists/burlington.pdf to http://www.nj.gov/dep/hpo/1identify/nrsr_lists/Burlington.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] y own observation, on-site

[1]