Talk:USS Oak Hill (LSD-51)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

First kiss milestone

I removed the material since it is not supported by the citation. Can a reliable source be posted here that supports the material to be added? --Mollskman (talk) 04:11, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is image of kiss --Mollskman (talk) 04:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why this citation was removed, but this could work. --Mollskman (talk) 04:16, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify whether you have access to the Japan Times source that was cited? I don't, but I was assuming that it supported the material. At any rate it's amply documented in other sources so there ought to be no problem replacing it –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't, but here is another one. We should be careful how the wording is so we are not engaging in OR. --Mollskman (talk) 04:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a citation to a news story in The Guardian that verifies the first-kiss status.[1] I've removed the comment about the reaction on the dock since I don't see that mentioned by any of the sources I've looked at. —C.Fred (talk) 04:26, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see a citation for fiance? --Mollskman (talk) 04:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Navy, in the description of the photo.[2] —C.Fred (talk) 04:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

opps, ok, sorry about that. --Mollskman (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Presuming you mean the 'it's disgusting' bit, I've had a brief look and can't find any mention of that either. Sure a bunch of people saying that in forums and other places that welcome comments but that's all. Nil Einne (talk) 07:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]