Talk:USS Nitze

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Homeport

This article would benefit with the information on the ship's homepart. --LeyteWolfer 04:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interception

Not sure this rises to the level of encyclopedic, given WP:NOTNEWS, but Nitze was in the new today: Iran defends actions after its ships conduct 'intercept' of USS Nitze Kendall-K1 (talk) 12:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I wish I'd come here before I wrote up that small section on the "intercept" incident. I probably would have let it pass, as you did. Still, it's there, but if it's decided that the incident doesn't warrant inclusion, it can be removed. -- Robertjamesftw (talk) 14:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on the fence. Let's leave it in for now, it can always be removed later if it doesn't pass the test of time. Kendall-K1 (talk) 17:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]