Talk:USS Katahdin (1893)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Event 250?

"embodied several new features later used in early submarines" Such as? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 18:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Her hull embodied several new features later used in early submarines." That line is from the DANFS entry on Katahdin http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/k2/katahdin-ii.htm The Navy historian did not elaborate. From what I have read, USS Katahdin (steel armored ram) of the US Navy is similar to the HMS Polyphemus (ironclad torpedo ram) of the Royal Navy. Basically the hulls of rams were engineered less like conventional surface ships and used features more like the hulls of later submarines. The ram hull was kept about 80% or more submerged to present as small a target as possible to gunfire, made water tight to prevent being swamped by shell splashes or ship wakes, and used jettisonable ballast and bouyancy chambers to prevent sinking in case of battle damage. The CSS David was a much smaller, earlier interation of similar ideas. Naaman Brown (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lengthy and detailed technical discussion and specifications published 1896

Anyone interested in expanding this will find "Contract and Screw Trials of the U.S.S. Kathadin", Journal of the American Society of Naval Engineers, v.8, February, 1896, pages 1—20, useful. The first pages discuss the origins of what was initially Harbor Defense Ram No. 1. That is followed by pages of discussion, tables and drawings detailing the design and functions of the vessel. 71.163.32.29 (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]