Talk:USS Idaho (BB-42)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- No DABs
- One dead link.
- Removed
- Images appropriately licensed.
- One duplicate link.
- Fixed
- Link main (gun) battery, aircraft catapult, Iceland
- Done
- mounts were true three-gun barrels huh? I'd just say that unlike earlier turrets, each gun could elevate independently
- How does "Unlike earlier American battleships with triple turrets, these mounts allowed each barrel to elevate independently" work for you?
- Explain /50 notation. Should probably add Mark #s as well.
- Added a note.
- Provide Imperial conversions for Bofors and Oerlikon guns
- Done
- after completing fitting-out work awkward
- How about "and after fitting-out work ended"?
- Shortly after commissioning too close usages of commissioning. Try "shortly afterward", ...
- Done
- Don't think that Naval Review should be capitalized.
- Good catch
- I'd delete the little bit about her reconstruction in the career section and add what wasn't already covered in the modification section to the modification section.
- That's a good idea
- Harold Rainsford Stark Don't really think that we need his middle name
- Good point
- transferred Idaho, the battleships Mississippi and New Mexico her sisters
- Done
- 5-inch (127 mm)/51 cal. already told us metric conversion--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed
- Don't forget about the ampersand in the references.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks Sturm. Parsecboy (talk) 13:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)