Talk:USS Flamingo (AM-32)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War I / World War II

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Merger proposal

These three articles, USS Flamingo (AM-32), USC&GS Guide, and USS Viking (ARS-1), all describe three different names of the same ship. From my quick look, it seems that none of these really need a separate article. I am proposing that they all be merged into the Flamingo article primarily because that was the first name of the ship, and in my opinion, the notability of the service under the other names is not as high as that under Flamingo. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I originally missed that the discussion was to be here, and had at first replied at WT:SHIPS. I support a merge; but my preference is to use the name the ship was last known under as the article name (ie: Viking). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, I'm watching both pages. It sounds like the consensus is to merge into USS Viking (ARS-1), so I'll change the merge templates to reflect that. — Bellhalla (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]