Talk:USS Bougainville (LHA-8)

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Using hull numbers in Design section

Llammakey, you removed the hull numbers from the "America and Tripoli were designed and built without a well deck" sentence, and then reverted me when I added them back with the claim that "hull numbers are for disambiguation only". This is not the case. The style guide explicitly permits the use of hull numbers for uses other than disambiguation in articles if "immediately relevant" (see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships)#Using_ship_class_names_in_articles). I'd argue that including the hull numbers are relevant in this case to make it clear that Bougainville follows America and Tripoli in sequence in the same class/type of vessel. Are you taking the position that it is never appropriate to use hull numbers for any other reason than disambiguation? To be clear, i'm not particularly insistent on using the hull numbers if you feel strongly that using them detracts from the article. —RP88 ^(talk) 04:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The hull number for Makin Island has no purpose whatsoever in the article. As for America and Tripoli, US hull numbers change and at the beginning it might be important to note it's the the third hull in the sequence, further down the line it could the only ship to receive an upgrade, or the fifth or the first of three. One could easily say, Bougainville was the third hull constructed, following America and Tripoli. That allows one to say the same information without relying on hull numbers that can/probably will change. Llammakey (talk) 11:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fair to say that the hull number for Makin Island is not as relevant as the other two. I only included it to further emphasize that while Bougainville's design (and the design of the other America-class ships) is based on Makin Island, Makin Island is of a different class and type (something that I already said in the text, thus for emphasis only). I'll remove that use. I also agree that it should be possible to rewrite the later text to not rely on the hull numbers to convey information. I'll remove these two uses of the hull numbers if I think of a good rewrite for this portion of the text. —RP88 ^(talk) 14:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]