Talk:USS Bennington (PG-4)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Below is my review of the article:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- I couldn't find a single sloppy sentence except this: 'the final tally of the dead was one officer and sixty-five men dead'. Not too happy with it. Please consider rewording.
- I changed it to "the final death toll was one officer and sixty-five men" — Bellhalla (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I couldn't find a single sloppy sentence except this: 'the final tally of the dead was one officer and sixty-five men dead'. Not too happy with it. Please consider rewording.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- The article is written brilliantly. Thanks for a nice read. Nothing else to say. - DSachan (talk) 09:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and the kind words. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)