Talk:USS Agile (MSO-421)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Needs additional verification

I don't understand why this page needs additional veriifcation when it is basically an excerpt from the U.S. Navy Dictionary of Americn warships. Wikited 23:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC) This ship was built as a Commadores ship and had larger than normal Packard engines and mor space on the o1 level.. other (Non FRAM) MSO had a clear walk through on the 01 level.[reply]

This ship MSO 421 had the 40 mm non powered non magnetic mount and not the 50 cal machine gun..(not 60 cal) when the Mine Sweeps went through FRAM they got the SQS-14 Sonar the Top came out where the 40mm mount is so it had to be removed, and the ship got 50 cal guns mounted higher up on the ship.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.236.112 (talk) 20:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]