Talk:UGENE

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tree of Life Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV?

The format is good, but it seems that it might be something of an ad for the product. Maethordaer (talk) 01:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maethordaer, what kind of information would you propose to add/remove to make this page better?

The project is open-source and free. It's not a commercial software. If you check the "Other Software" section items, you'll see real commercial software with description that is not better and having not any 'special' tags for 'neutrality' Another example could be 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Commander' - also not open source and not free. Mfursov (talk) 18:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into this, Mfursov. This is a case actually where I didn't know how to assess the subject's notability or neutrality. I thought it sounded very positive and perhaps a little suspicious, but seeing as I wasn't in any way familiar with the topic I wasn't sure. Usually I look at the article's talk page and history to see what others think so that I can get a better feel for things, but I stumbled across this doing new page patrol, so it didn't have much history for me to judge. That's why I chose the pov-check tag (and not the pov tag): that way someone who would be familiar with the topic would be able to review and decide, which is what you did - thanks! :-) That being said, all Wiki articles need to be adequately sourced (unless it's a stub), just as the articles that this one links to do, so I'm going to reestablish that tag. This is for the good of the article: if we can get references, then it will be less likely that some other editor will think it's non-notable. Maethordaer (talk) 21:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maethordaer, here are links to UGENE from different well-known sites: http://hmmer.janelia.org http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=ugene

I think now we can omit this warning: "This article needs sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications." ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.17.10.114 (talk) 13:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]