Talk:UFC 120/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Meetthefeebles (talk · contribs) 16:06, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review. Give me a day or so to put some substantive comments up... Meetthefeebles (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't forgotten this one; work has been unexpectedly hectic over the last couple of days so it will be Thursday by the time I get to it. Apologies for this delay... Meetthefeebles (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Until the reviewer gets back I have some suggestions.

The sections need adjusting. For example "Card criticism" and "Attendance and gate figures" are not really about the background of the event (which usually discusses what lead up to the event).
In skimming the article I don't see any prose about the fights themselves. A brief synopsis and/or paragraph about each fight stating why it was notable would be good.
The results/stats section would be more visually appealing, and more readable, if it used the table format that is slowly being introduced such as in UFC 148.
The entrance music section should contain at least a one sentence introduction and the citation placed at the end of the sentence (as opposed to hanging on after the table).
Done. --LlamaAl (talk) 01:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Flags in the article should conform with MOS:FLAG (none in the infobox) and the recently ended RFC at WP:MMA.
Done. --LlamaAl (talk) 01:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bonus awards sentence is confusing to me, let alone a non-MMA fan. Add more prose to explain who got how much for their award.

That's all I have for now. --TreyGeek (talk) 04:34, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

There has been no action by the reviewer since late November, no edits here at all for over four weeks, and the article appears to have been gutted four days ago. As this nomination has been clearly abandoned, I think this review should be concluded unless action is taken right away. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I had been waiting for a response to the comments made above by TrayGeek but nothing seems to have been forthcoming. I will wait another day or two to see if anyone has anything else to add and will the close the nomination. Meetthefeebles (talk) 10:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still minimal progress after well over a month at GAN, so failing this. Wizardman 19:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]