Talk:U2charist

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Someone???

Re-wrote entire article after PROD. Someone who actually thinks this is a good idea (not the page, but the subject itself) please, please, please take over this article. It's got current relevance, lots and lots of references, so you'll enjoy it. I, on the other hand, still feel nauseous. --Chalyres 17:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this for real?

Surely not... 69.196.132.122 (talk) 04:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ASCAP does not require a license...

Certainly incorrect. Please provide source for this. The reason for the invention of CCLI is because of the copyright infringements of churches -- it has nothing to do if the effort is profit generating or not. The copyright holders of church music were suing other churches, what do you think a securlar ASCAP has to say? This argument has been used falsely for years by churches for their violating of copyright.Tiggerjay (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The licence is not required in this instance because U2 has specifically exempted royalties as long as the the event complies with the terms listed. Using U2's music in a normal worship service would require proper licencing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.60.107.86 (talk) 17:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]