Talk:U.S. Route 6 in Iowa/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 04:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
ELs and DABs look good.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Good here.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Good here.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Good here.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Good here.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No photos (which is a shame, but not a requirement), but I note that the map should have its GIS source(s) indicated by the creator. The map should have a caption added.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Final verdict is a pass. The minor issue over the map won't withhold passage. Imzadi 1979 → 02:37, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: