Jump to content

Talk:U.S. Route 6 in Iowa/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 04:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

ELs and DABs look good.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Looks good after a few tweaks.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Good here.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Good here.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Good here.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Good here.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No photos (which is a shame, but not a requirement), but I note that the map should have its GIS source(s) indicated by the creator. The map should have a caption added.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Final verdict is a pass. The minor issue over the map won't withhold passage. Imzadi 1979  02:37, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]