Talk:U.S. Route 67 in Iowa

U.S. Route 67 in Iowa has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 17, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: Iowa Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Locations

Iowa

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in December 2016.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 67 in Iowa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jgera5 (talk · contribs) 16:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A (prose):

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
For a relatively short article, it is very well-sourced.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
No edit wars.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
This article is fairly stable, is well-sourced, and very well-written. My only complaint is that it could use one or two more images. But overall, I would say that this is definitely a good article. Jgera5 (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]