Talk:U.S. Route 33 in Michigan/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- In the first sentence you should mention Berrien County is in Michigan (just to make sure to mention the state in the first sentence of prose).
- "According Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), the agency that maintained the roadway, for the last year it was US 33,", should clearly indicate what specific year this is.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- A map and an image of the former route would be nice, but not required to pass GAN.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
A couple minor concerns, but otherwise good. Will put on hold. Dough4872 03:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Both minor items have been addressed, Dough4872. Imzadi 1979 → 03:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- I will pass the article. Congrats on another GA! Dough4872 03:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)