Talk:U.S. Route 30 in Indiana

U.S. Route 30 in Indiana has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 6, 2014. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways / Auto trails / Indiana Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. Highways

U.S. auto trails

Locations

Indiana

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in November 2014.

United States: Indiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 30 in Indiana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Neonblak (talk · contribs) 02:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will be conducting a review of this article, and hopefully we can get this promoted.Neonblak ^talk - 02:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	All comments below have been addressed.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Layout is correct, and all sections are properly constructed.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	All references are formatted correctly.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All photos have proper licensing.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All photos are valuable in illustrating the topic.
	7. Overall assessment.	A finely written article, this article meets all GA requirements.

Lead

"... and all of the highway is listed on the National Highway System." - Why not use the line in the article. "The entire length of U.S. Route 30 in Indiana is included in the National Highway System (NHS)."
"Various sections are rural four-lane highway and urbanized four-lane divided expressway." - conflicting singular and plural usage, maybe this is what you are after? Should use the six-lane spots in the lead, seemed an important point in the article. "The highway includes four-lane, rural sections, an urbanized, four-lane divided expressway, and several high-traffic, six-lane areas."
I would use the singular "Realignment", due to its relationship to the plural word "projects".

Route description

"US 30 runs along the northside of Plymouth, passing through an interchange with the northern terminus of SR 17 and near the Plymouth Municipal Municipal Airport." - northside = north side, and Municipal is repeated.
"At the diamond interchange with I-69, US 33 runs south on I-69, while US 30 continues north ~~onto the interstate~~, concurrent with both I-69 and US 24;" - area lined out sounds redundant.
"In 2010, INDOT figured that lowest traffic levels were 10,870 vehicles and 4,750 commercial vehicles used the highway daily between US 31 and SR 331. The peak traffic volumes were 69,280 vehicles and 12,660 commercial vehicles AADT along the section of US 30 at is concurrent with I-69, between the Lima Road and Coldwater Road exits in Fort Wayne" - Is this what you meant? "In 2010, INDOT figures indicated that 10,870 vehicles and 4,750 commercial vehicles used the highway daily between US 31 and SR 331. The peak traffic volumes were 69,280 vehicles and 12,660 commercial vehicles AADT along the section of US 30 that is concurrent with I-69, between the Lima Road and Coldwater Road exits in Fort Wayne."

@Red Phoenix, Just a couple of small items, northside is two words, together they make a noun; and "...12,660 commercial vehicles AADT along the section of US 30 at is concurrent with I-69," - the word that is in bold changed to aht.Neonblak ^talk - 22:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History

@Neonblak: ... now that's bizarre. I did have those fixed; I think VisualEditor is acting up. It's done so as well when I've been working on my latest FAC as well. In any case, I went ahead and fixed these by going into the source and editing it, so that should ensure it's fixed and stays that way this time. Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 11:44, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That IS weird, technology is great, but sometimes very frustrating ! Hopefully, the kinks will worked out on that program. This article is good to go, so I will pass it now, thanks again for your time and effort. Neonblak ^talk - 11:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"In the early 1920s, the Lincoln Highway was moved farther south between Valparaiso and Fort Wayne,..." - Maybe I missed it, but since it wasn't moved south previously, I don't think you need the word farther inserted in there. It was just moved south.

@Neonblak: All comments addressed. Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 01:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on U.S. Route 30 in Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615200707/http://www.in.gov/indot/files/StateWide_2004.pdf to http://www.in.gov/indot/files/StateWide_2004.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]