Talk:U.S. Route 27 in Michigan/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 13:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
I would like to review this later today. TCN7JM 13:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Alright, I've fixed, like, six typos in the first section of the RD alone, and I'm too tired to finish the review, so between now and tomorrow when I plan to resume the review, please check over the remainder of the article for typos. Thanks. TCN7JM 06:56, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Continuing the review:
- I'm seeing some problems with tense in the RD. There's at least one sentence (at the beginning of the second section) in which the tense changes midway through, and some more in which the tense doesn't make any sense given the noun used in the sentence. For example, saying "The freeway intersected the northern end of the business loop..." doesn't make much sense because from what I'm seeing, the freeway still does despite not carrying US 27 anymore. If possible you should try to fix more confusing sentences of this nature.
- "The US 27A loop into Shepherd was removed the next year in 1939." – Isn't this redundant? 1938 was just mentioned in the previous sentence.
- What does MSHD's request for more Interstate mileage have to do with US 27?
This is all. I have finished my review and am putting the article on hold. TCN7JM 02:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- All are done, but could you please skim the RD again to see if I missed something? Imzadi 1979 → 04:36, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Looks fine to me. I will pass the article now. TCN7JM 04:46, 11 November 2013 (UTC)