Talk:U.S. Route 264

Revised map needed

The graphics show US 264 reaching NC12 at Nags Head - whereas I think the eastern endpoint is actually in Manns Harbor in Mainland Dare at the 64/264 junction - Can someone fix this ? Ivan Warren 16:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

That is correct, US 264 ends at Manns Harbor; I will see if I can get somebody from the maps task force to help, but they are probably busy to help correct anytime soon. --WashuOtaku (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Splitting I-587

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I was just wondering what opinions are about splitting I-587. The small section it's in currently is definitely neglected and should be much bigger for a route close to completion. Also, a large section has been designated as an Interstate, which I would believe enough criteria for it to be official. DiscoA340 (talk) 16:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Probably should be now, as of today, signage for I-587 now appear on the freeway; well, they removed US 264 and slapped I-587 while leaving the old east-west markers on it, though I am sure it was supposed to be north-south. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

I have made a bare-bones draft article, I'll work more on it tomorrow but anyone is welcome to add to it if they want. DiscoA340 (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

I also have a draft article Draft:Interstate 587 (North Carolina). It probably needs a copy edit but it's practically complete. Ncchild (talk) 00:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Unless there is another I-587 hiding out there, the new article should be just Interstate 587, with any such redirects as needed. Imzadi 1979 → 00:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Ncchild That's a better version for the new article, please disregard my last comment. DiscoA340 (talk) 00:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Imzadi1979 it looks like there is also one in New York. Edit: sorry the formatting was off for a second, I was doing this from my phone. Ncchild (talk) 01:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

I'm afraid so, my idea was to add a "(NC)" at the end of the title but I'm open to suggestions. DiscoA340 (talk) 01:03, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Looking at the draft @Ncchild it looks good, the only thing I would recommend is adding a "Future" section which talks about the eventual designation of the route, west of I-95. but all in all, it's good. DiscoA340 (talk) 01:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

It would be (North Carolina) like Interstate 795 (North Carolina) or Interstate 440 (North Carolina). But that’s a good idea, I can work on adding it in the next couple hours. Ncchild (talk) 01:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Two quick things. For one, I wrote the article expecting US 264 to be moved onto its alternate route from Farmville to Greenville, as was proposed by NCDOT and approved by AASHTO. NCDOT does seem to be replacing the US 264 signs with I-587 ones (instead of putting them next to each other) which seems to indicate this. However, is this significant enough to consider US 264 as moved onto its new route?

Secondly, I think, but am not positive that I-587 is using its own mile markers, which likely means it will use its own exits. But I don't have confirmation of either. Should I leave it as is right now? Ncchild (talk) 03:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

I expect NCDOT is currently in the process of rerouting US 264 between north of Saratoga to Greenville, we already have the paperwork confirming this, and as part of I-587 designation, so we should go ahead and correct articles on this new alignment as well. The biggest trick now is breaking up US 264 Alt, which will be fragmented to two sections: Zebulon-Wilson and Greenville. --WashuOtaku (talk) 13:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

It's nice to see anther interstate article on Wikipedia, good job on the draft again @Ncchild! DiscoA340 (talk) 14:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

I was also wondering if we should delete the I-587 section from this page? DiscoA340 (talk) 14:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, but we are still using the split discussion for communication. It can wait till we make all the changes. --WashuOtaku (talk) 14:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Washuotaku Perfect, and thanks for correcting all the state routes that I left as is earlier this morning ahaha! And thank you @DiscoA340!! Ncchild (talk) 14:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

I'd leave some summary section on I-587 here, say just the small infobox and a little summary in the history. Imzadi 1979 → 14:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

I do not think that is necessary, this should all be in the History section as I-587 replaces and continue to replace US 264 between Zebulon and Greenville. --WashuOtaku (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

No problem @Ncchild. I also had another idea for the page. What if the future route west of I-95 in the map was another color to represent it not being complete? Kind of like how Interstate 840 (North Carolina) has it for its map. DiscoA340 (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for double commenting but I found this tool on the Connect NCDOT website which may be of use. I've noticed that in both Beaufort and Pitt Counties plan, it shows them wanting a freeway grade route to continue on US 264 until Washington, NC. It might not mean anything related to I-587 though. DiscoA340 (talk) 14:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

The map can be done, I can work on it later today. As for any sort of upgrades to Washington, I think that would be better suited for a future section of this article (US 264). I can begin working on cleaning up and upgrading 264 but it'll be after I finish NC 97. Ncchild (talk) 14:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Sounds good, thanks again for your help! DiscoA340 (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.