Jump to content

Talk:U.S. Route 161/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 15:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Looks good
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No issues here
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    All fine.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Rarely an issue with this type of article
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Unless you're edit-warring with yourself, this has to be stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Looks good.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    No issues with the article that preclude GA status. Imzadi 1979  16:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]