Jump to content

Talk:U.S. Route 11 in Maryland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleU.S. Route 11 in Maryland has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 28, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 11 in Maryland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 02:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, but I am placing it on hold so that you can address a few concerns.

Disamb link: Hager House.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "constructed in the late 1900s" means 1995. Just say "1909" which is what appears in the History section.
     Fixed  V 20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    "crosses Norfolk Southern Railway's Hagerstown District" - what is it? a line? a freight yard?
     Fixed I clarified that it is a rail line.  V 20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    "and immediately crosses the Norfolk Southern rail line again" - at grade?
     Fixed I clarified that the highway crosses over the rail line.  V 20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    "bridge across the Potomac River was rebuilt in 1978 and 1979" should be "bridge across the Potomac River was rebuilt in 1978-79" because it was only rebuilt once.
     Fixed I changed to a single year, 1979, to remove the ambiguity.  V 20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    "For this extension, US 11 was relocated to a tunnel underneath the extended runway in 2006." I assume that when building the tunnel, they did not go back to the original alignment, but kept the curve. Please state one way or the other.
    I rewrote the sentence as follows: "For this extension, US 11 was relocated to a tunnel underneath the extended runway along the curved alignment in 2006." Let me know if that addresses the issue or if you have any further suggestions.  V 20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    In route description, clarify that the WVA-MD state line is the south side of the Potomac River, so that the bridge is in Maryland.
     Fixed  V 20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Based on actual signage, it is accurate to say that the junction is with both I-81 and I-70 in the junction table?
     Fixed I checked the signage and I-70 is not included, so I removed the I-70 mention from the Junction list.  V 20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I am putting the article on hold. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 03:13, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed all of your concerns. Please let me know if you have any questions.  V 20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and fixed the link to Hager House. Good work. Congratulations. Racepacket (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]