Talk:U.S. Bank Center (Milwaukee)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg (talk · contribs) 20:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will be reviewing this article shortly. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 20:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Visitors were initially allowed to visit it, and it was the site for several years of the New Year's Eve event "Firstar Eve", though it was closed for all intents and purposes by 1991 because the firm Foley & Lardner did not want members of the public walking through their offices" is quite long and I recommend shortening it.
- One idea: Visitors were initally allowed to visit it, and it was the site for several years of the New Year's Eve event "Firstar Eve". It was closed to the public in 1991 because the firm Foley & Lardner did not want members of the public walking through their offices. Obviously feel free to reword it a different way.
On the 37th and 35th citation, please fill out all the possible fields, instead of leaving it as a link.
All images are tagged properly.
All sources seem reliable.
Copyvio report came back clean.
I don't think we need the disambig at the top, since the article in question has been moved.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

I am putting this article on hold, until these issues are fixed. @Zonafan39:. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 21:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- It has been two weeks, and no changes were made to the article, or to this page. I will be failing it, as it currently doesn't meet criteria. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 19:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]